Ontological Argument Is Not Reliant On An Posteriori

Ontological Argument Saint Anselm created the â€Å"Ontological Argument†. Saint Anselm was the archbishop of Canterbury. The premise of Saint Anselm’s Ontological Argument is that, no greater being can be conceived than God. The Ontological Argument is an a priori or deductive argument. An a priori argument does not have to be supported by real or factual evidence just by reason without observation. Thus, the Ontological Argument is not reliant on an a posteriori premise. An a posteriori argument is an inductive argument and usually considered to be true because of past evidence or reasoning and rarely false. In â€Å"Core Questions in Philosophy† by Elliot Sober, Sober first discusses how Saint Anselm’s Ontological Argument agues the†¦show more content†¦However, nothing can be imagined greater or more perfect than God. So therefore Anselm believes, God must exist in every possible world. However, Gaunilo and Kant criticize Anselm’s Ontol ogical Argument. First, Guanilo believes that Saint Anselm’s Ontological Argument is faulty. Regardless that the Ontological Argument is deductively valid, Gaunilo believed there must be something inaccurate with the argument. Gaunilo used a concept of a perfect island, which he shortens to P-island. Gaunilo’s counter-argument is actually in the same format of Anselm’s Ontological Argument, which is an a priori argument. The theory of a P-island is that no greater island can be thought of. This theory begins the same way as Anselm starts out the Ontological Argument. By paralleling to the Ontological Argument, that no greater being can be thought of greater than God; Gaunelos premise is that, no greater island to be though of than P-island. So furthermore, P-island is the best possible island. His first premise was, P-island is the greatest possible imaginable island. Second was that, if the island doesn t exist in the real world, it is not as perfect as an isl and that exists in all possible worlds. Then, his result was that a P-island is not contingent but exists necessarily. Furthermore, Gaunelo next concluded that the two premises of the P-island counter-argument are true; but that it doesn t deductively imply the conclusion. He then states that this mustShow MoreRelatedDoes The Ontological Argument Successfully Show That God Exists? Essay1859 Words   |  8 PagesNumber - SYBSAM001 Course code - PHI1024F Course Lecturer – Dean Chapman Tutor – Kajal Carr Does the Ontological Argument successfully show that God exists? God – â€Å"a being of which nothing greater can be conceived.† (Blackburn, S, 1999. Think. New York United States of America, Oxford University Press Inc. 5:154) The ontological argument put forward by St Anselm, is based on this definition. The argument, Anselm’s premises, the concept of god being understood, god existing in the understanding and godRead MoreEssay about Desire in Herman Melville’s Moby-Dick2921 Words   |  12 Pagesthe impenetrable wall, as well as the foundation, of being—and nothingness. As Rene Girard observes, â€Å"Every hero of a novel expects his being to be radically changed by the act of possession.† 4 More broadly, as Girard implies throughout his argument, the literary project typically entails the achievement or failure of desire, made manifest by the fixed protocols of comedy and tragedy, respectively—with multiple variations on the classic literary modes in synchronic practice. Ishmael as desiring